Can Article 370 be seen as indestructible feature of Constitution, asks Supreme court

For the second day running, the Supreme Court expressed scepticism about the stand taken by those opposing the hollowing of Article 370, with the CJI D Y Chandrachud-led constitution bench questioning the assumption that the provision, which was conceived as temporary, had turned into an indestructible feature of the Constitution once the Constituent Assembly of J&K, the sole mechanism provided for in the Constitution to carry out changes in it, ceased to exist in 1957.

from Times of India https://ift.tt/GNFm3xY
https://ift.tt/Fs62V04
For the second day running, the Supreme Court expressed scepticism about the stand taken by those opposing the hollowing of Article 370, with the CJI D Y Chandrachud-led constitution bench questioning the assumption that the provision, which was conceived as temporary, had turned into an indestructible feature of the Constitution once the Constituent Assembly of J&K, the sole mechanism provided for in the Constitution to carry out changes in it, ceased to exist in 1957.
For the second day running, the Supreme Court expressed scepticism about the stand taken by those opposing the hollowing of Article 370, with the CJI D Y Chandrachud-led constitution bench questioning the assumption that the provision, which was conceived as temporary, had turned into an indestructible feature of the Constitution once the Constituent Assembly of J&K, the sole mechanism provided for in the Constitution to carry out changes in it, ceased to exist in 1957.
August 04, 2023 at 01:58AM